Studying For Funsies - CARRIAGES

18thcenturylove:

Sooo like a true history peep, I take notes on random bits of historical history. This week, carriages! :D (forgive me if I made a mistake!)

BAROUCHE

image

BERLINE

image

CABRIOLET

image

CALASH (also name for folding top on BAROUCHE, CHAISE and VICTORIA)

image

CHAISE (CHAY, SHAY)

image

CURRICLE (TYPE OF CHAISE)

image

COUPE

image

No roof for driver = COUPE DE-VILLE
Coupé de-ville with folding top = LANDAU
Coupé de-ville with folding top over passenger =LANDAULET

DILIGENCE

image

HANSOM (BASED ON CABRIOLET, A TYPE OF “FLY”)

image

- "Fly" = A cab (short for cabriolet) for hire, hansom replaced hackney
- A hackney of a more expensive or high class was called a REMISE

OMNIBUS

image

PHAETON

image

VICTORIA (PHAETON BUT CLASSIER)

image

(via lilith-et-adalia)

klokwerkheart:

novas-grimoire:

kemeticlokean:

lolstitanic:

zombiesandporn:

n-a-blue-box:

angel-kink:

parallelanprincess:

youarenothingsignificant:

parallelanprincess:

happy-for-someriseing:

I love Anastasia but they get so much shit wrong and I had to talk about it.

As a history major currently studying Soviet Russia I would like to formally bless this post

History majors have a hard time just sitting and enjoying period pieces….especially with others

"Wait a second…that’s not right…"
"HISTORICAL INACCURACY!!"

^ You understand me friend

I was about to be like “jeez it’s just a cartoon” but nearly died laughing at this post multiple time. read this post. it’s good post

Omg.
"Non. I do not give une fuck"
Dead.

jesus christ, its a kids movie! of course its not gonna be—  this is a thing of beauty 

We watched this in AP euro and all we did was make jokes

HOPEFULLY NOT WITH HIS BAT

Bartok was the best part of the movie. 


Balshoyu!

Kharasho!

it is a dreadful animated film, corny and saccharine and  generally just  quite bad… 

(via beradan)

It just seems so appropriate we’re having an actual clan chief visit our festival the weekend before Scotland will vote for its independence. 

justlikeabaroness:

venort:

daphneontherun:

historical-nonfiction:

micdotcom:

Whoa, scientists have finally uncovered the identity of Jack the Ripper 

I don’t normally reblog things, but this is simply too interesting to not make a note of! Read more at the Independent or the Mirror

This is so misleading that it is frankly a lie.

First of all, “Scientists” haven’t solved anything except determined the results of a DNA test—matching a still-living descendent of the sister of a mental patient with a 126-year-old semen stain on the shawl of a single woman thought to be killed by the Ripper.

  • The idea that they could have a “100% match” is highly tenuous at best; siblingship is a tricky thing to discover through DNA to begin with, and vastly more so when you take into account that they’re testing the descendent of a sibling. There’s a reason that whenever possible, geneticists prefer to test a parent as well as a sibling, given how many DNA loci are recombined to form a sibling’s DNA. They also “matched” the shawl’s owner’s bloodstain to her “three-times great-granddaughter,” proving again a “100% match.” 
  • The DNA evidence has not been independently verified by any authorities.
  • The shawl itself, the one and only piece of physical evidence, has not been independently verified. It “is thought” to have been part of the case.
  • The lead detective on the case is not a detective. He is a self-proclaimed “armchair detective” and history nut. 
  • He is selling a book about this. It doesn’t take an “armchair detective” to realize that a book about looking for Jack the Ripper’s identity is not going to turn a profit without showing “conclusive proof” that they’ve found the killer. 
  • His only other proof is the fact that Kosminski was recorded as a suspect in the 1800s by the police, who were notedly anti-Semetic (Kosminski was a Polish Jew). 
  • This “study,” if it can even be called that when the information was clearly biased, was reported in the Daily Mail and the Mirror, not exactly shining bastions of journalism. Look for it to be discredited very soon. I’m betting Cracked’s “B.S. News Stories that Fooled Your Facebook Friends” gets there within a week.
  • The apparently brilliant scientist that has pioneered this new DNA matching technology, Dr. Jari Louhelainen, is hardly a standout in his field. He is not decorated, has received no awards or fellowships that I’ve been able to find, and is a professor at a college that has turned out only one notable alumnus in the scientific field, ever (and she is an astrophysicist). 
  • Even if the shawl and its two spots of purported DNA were not obviously of over-inflated importance (and if they could be verified), that is far from saying the mystery of Jack the Ripper is solved. All that would be in today’s courtroom is a single piece of circumstantial evidence for ONE of five serial murders.

IN SUMMATION.

  1. The newspaper that reported this is a tabloid.
  2. The “detective” is an amateur with a book to sell.
  3. The “scientist” is a lecturer at a new university in England that focuses on sports.
  4. The “evidence” is over-hyped and far from conclusive.
  5. The “evidence” only points to Kosminski for ONE murder out of five.

This is not research. This is sensationalism. The mystery of Jack the Ripper is far from solved.

No shawl was recorded at the scene of the crime, no witnesses mentioned her as wearing it in the hours before her body was found (and one group encountered her within ten minutes of her death), and most importantly: Kosminski wasn’t identified as a suspect until 6 years after the murders, and HE WAS NON-VIOLENT. While he was neurodivergent (experiencing auditory hallucinations, among other things), he was specifically described as having no violent tendencies. ‘man blames immigrant for something they played no part in’ is hardly newsworthy, nor is ‘whitechapel man visited sex worker in 1888’.

Reblogged for truth. People don’t know better. Great explanation. This smacks of anti-Semitism, and sensationalism. Aside from all this, there’s no proof that Kosminski, who was indeed Polish, could even speak English. His family spoke to him in Polish, and no one verified his ability in other languages. He needed English to speak to the victims.

(via beradan)

Anonymous asked:

Are you interested in British royalty only or do you like other countries' monarchs as well (e. g. Sweden)?

In all honesty, I’m not entirely interested in royalty at all—I barely paid any attention to them prior to starting this blog (except for the 5 months I lived in Edinburgh, during which Will & Kate’s wedding took place and it was IMPOSSIBLE to avoid all the news about it).  The British monarchy are really just the ones I am most familiar with, and I’ll reblog and comment on stuff about them since I know many of my followers are interested, plus they seem to be the most relevant to this blog.  I don’t mean to exclude other countries’ monarchies, it just kind of happened that way. 

I’m calling it now:  Will and Kate’s second kid is a girl.